Video Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing
FIT USB drives
Usually, when there is a subject that I am curious about and can't find it on WP, I google about it until I can create an article. I was recently given a FIT USB drive. It is not clear to me if it is as different from standard USB flash drive as Secure Digital and CompactFlash or whether there should be content in the USB flash drive article about them. I also do not understand why some sources discuss mini USB drives while others mention the term FIT USB drives. It seems that these drives moved to 3.0 technology around 2013/14, but I am not sure when these drives first came into being. Can someone find a way to help readers or help me to find content to help readers in this regard.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 16:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- You might consider expanding USB flash drive § Size and style of packaging to mention this product line. I'm not sure this deserves an article of it's own. ~Kvng (talk) 14:57, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Maps Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Computing
PROD notice
C2.LOP has been proposed for deletion. If you wish to contest the deletion, just remove the tag (and hopefully improve the article). Happy editing! Ajpolino (talk) 21:54, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- WP:DEPRODDED ~Kvng (talk) 14:52, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
eSATAp
Are the sources on eSATAp good? Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 04:54, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- They sources could be better. Here are a couple of book sources, [1][2], but by themselves might not be enough for notability. --Mark viking (talk) 05:09, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
- Nice, thanks! Jjjjjjdddddd (talk) 05:24, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
CT Connect
CT Connect has been tagged for being unencyclopedic and of unclear notability for almost a decade. I'm not sure what we should do with it. Much of it is written as a personal reflection and may be challenging to verify, but there's lots of info in there that looks potentially useful? I'm not sure if the sources exist to support a free-standing CT Connect article, but if anyone know more on the topic perhaps they'd have some input? If not, perhaps we could merge any useful chunks to computer telephony integration, Digital Equipment Corporation, et al? Any thoughts would be much appreciated. Ajpolino (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Category:Information storage has been nominated for discussion
Category:Information storage, which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) o (contribs) 00:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
GAR Notice
ZX Spectrum, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Indrian (talk) 16:27, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
´,
÷,np -- Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.99.101.70 (talk) 23:24, 29 March 2018 (UTC)
Merge request requiring technical knowledge
Please comment on the proposed merge at Talk:LR(*) parser. Thank you, Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:13, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Development status of Apache Open Office in the article's infobox
Hi, there. I invite everyone to participate. There is an ongoing discussion on how to describe the development status of Apache Open Office in the article's infobox. The discussion is at Talk:Apache OpenOffice. Jonpatterns (talk) 16:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Move discussion
Talk:GBA_(disambiguation)#Requested_move_13_April_2018 Jytdog (talk) 03:00, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Source of the article : Wikipedia
0 Comments